<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PlanMyGreen.com &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planmygreen.com/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planmygreen.com</link>
	<description>All Things Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 06:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Earth&#8217;s Newest Island</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/the-earths-newest-island/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/the-earths-newest-island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glacier loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petermann Glacier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Anthony Ricigliano - Articles And PRs by Anthony Ricigliano: The Earth has a brand new island in the form of a chunk of ice four times the size of Manhattan after it broke off from the Petermann Glacier in Greenland. The ice island is slowly drifting across the Arctic Ocean with the potential to make its way toward oil platforms and busy shipping lanes off of Newfoundland.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Ice Island calves off Petermann Glacier by NASA Goddard Photo and Video, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/4876599064/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4080/4876599064_4cf62280a5.jpg" alt="Ice Island calves off Petermann Glacier" width="300" height="273.6" /></a> <span style="font-size: xx-large;"><span><strong><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><br />
</span></span></strong></span></span></p>
<p><strong>Author: <a title="Anthony Ricigliano" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/anthony-ricigliano/485188">Anthony Ricigliano</a></strong></p>
<p>The Earth has a brand new island in the form of a chunk of ice four times the size of Manhattan after it broke off from the Petermann Glacier in Greenland. The ice island is slowly drifting across the Arctic Ocean with the potential to make its way toward oil platforms and busy shipping lanes off of Newfoundland.</p>
<p>The ice island is approximately one hundred square miles in size and is the largest northern hemisphere ice island since 1962. &#8220;It&#8217;s so big that you can&#8217;t prevent it from drifting. You can&#8217;t stop it,&#8221; said Jon-Ove Methlie Hagen, a glaciologist at the University of Oslo. The challenge now is to track the likely trajectory of the island to determine the potential danger which could be wreaked in the shipping lanes and Canada&#8217;s offshore platforms in the Grand Banks off Newfoundland.<span id="more-687"></span></p>
<p>The island is drifting toward the Nares Strait which could feed the island into southbound ocean currents. These currents would carry the island down Canada&#8217;s east coast and directly into the busy shipping lanes and oil drilling operations unless the usual winter freeze arrives on time and locks down the Strait. If it gets into the Nares Strait earlier than expected or the winter freeze is late, the floating ice shelf would become problematic.</p>
<p>Besides the obvious problems presented to ships, another complex problem is the threat to the offshore oil platforms in its path. Smaller icebergs can be redirected using water cannons or by towing but this ice shelf is so big that changing its direction would be difficult, if not impossible. If the platforms are threatened, they will probably have to shut down operations and be moved. The logistics of this type of action take time, money, and are very complicated, especially when the rigs are fixed to the ocean floor. The complexities would increase considerably if multiple rigs are threatened at the same time.</p>
<p>At its current size, the island contains the equivalent of the fresh water flowing through the Hudson River for two years. While it&#8217;s likely to break into smaller icebergs as it bumps into other icebergs and jagged islands, the bergs will still be huge in comparison to what normally floats out of the Nares Strait. The bergs would also be affected by wind, waves and higher temperatures as they head south.</p>
<p>The ice sheet is already a topic in the global warming discussion and should remain so during its journey. At this point, however, experts are reluctant to attribute the giant ice island to climate change due to all the variables that affect glaciers in the area. The ongoing retreat of Greenland&#8217;s glaciers has accelerated in recent years, and is one of the least understood pieces of the climate puzzle.</p>
<p>Despite the variables beyond those directly tied to global warming, the event coincides with worrisome signs of warming in the Arctic. Over the last forty years, Arctic temperatures have risen by 4.5 degrees Fahrenheit and Arctic sea ice measured in June was at its lowest level for the month since records started being kept in 1979.</p>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s a result of global warming or other factors, this ice island is likely to be the center of attention for environmentalists as well as the area&#8217;s shipping and oil industries.</p>
<p>Article Source: <a title="The Earth's Newest Island - By Anthony Ricigliano" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/environment-articles/the-earths-newest-island-by-anthony-ricigliano-3279156.html">http://www.articlesbase.com/environment-articles/the-earths-newest-island-by-anthony-ricigliano-3279156.html</a></p>
<p><strong>About the Author</strong></p>
<p><a title="Anthony Ricigliano Author" href="http://www.articlesbase.com/authors/anthony-ricigliano/485188">Anthony Ricigliano</a>&#8216;s background in information technology, distribution, purchasing and regulatory affairs then gives him an edge with integrating that infrastructure with areas in the company that generate revenues.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/the-earths-newest-island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Trading For You and Me</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/carbon-trading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/carbon-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all have a way of life, and while some of us can afford to put solar panels on our houses, there are still emissions produced from everything we do every day, from the production of the clothes you wear, to the furniture you sit on, and from the food you eat, to the services [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Carbon footprint by net_efekt, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wheatfields/3102519042/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/3102519042_cf3c5da6fc.jpg" alt="Carbon footprint" width="400" height="266.4" /></a></p>
<div id="body">
<p>We all have a way of life, and while some of us can afford to put solar panels on our houses, there are still emissions produced from everything we do every day, from the production of the clothes you wear, to the furniture you sit on, and from the food you eat, to the services you consume. Besides, we don&#8217;t all want to drive a hybrid car and become vegetarians. So what can we do?</p>
<p><strong>What is Carbon Trading?</strong></p>
<p>Carbon trading, or carbon offsetting, is a way to balance or compensate for carbon emissions in one geographical place, with a reduction in emissions in another. Since it doesn&#8217;t matter where Greenhouse Gases (GHG) are emitted, as their effect on climate change is global, reducing emissions in Brazil or Italy is as effective as doing so locally. &#8216;Carbon emissions&#8217; refers to carbon dioxide (CO²), and are a form of GHG, as is methane and nitrous oxide, but for most of us it is easier to think in terms of carbon emissions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s completely voluntary, but in 2011 it will become compulsory for some industries. While we do need to reduce our personal carbon emissions and stop being wasteful, some emissions are currently unavoidable, so carbon offsetting is the way to compensate for those emissions we cannot stop.<span id="more-545"></span></p>
<p>Little things, when done by millions of people, can make a big difference, and carbon offsetting reduces emissions with a minimum of effort and cost. Offsetting means paying someone else to reduce CO² in the atmosphere on your behalf. In that way we pay for the damage we are causing and the money stimulates the development of green technologies that we desperately.</p>
<p><strong>What is a Carbon Credit?</strong></p>
<p>Carbon reduction projects throughout the world create a tradable &#8216;carbon credit&#8217; for every tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO²-e) that is stopped from entering our atmosphere. When you buy a credit, it is then &#8216;retired&#8217; so it can&#8217;t be sold again &#8211; the credit will be recorded against your name, meaning that you have stopped one tonne of CO²-e that otherwise would have entered the atmosphere.</p>
<p>There are many different kinds of carbon credits. Certified carbon credits are created by government approved abatement projects. These include projects such as harnessing landfill gas, reforestation and sequestration, and electricity consumption reduction.</p>
<p>Beware: because there are plenty of people claiming to produce carbon credits, but they are in fact not accredited, nor are they even measured properly. You might be paying someone for nothing.</p>
<p>And how much does it cost? Generally, a carbon credit is $20, though this will probably rise. The Government will be setting a cap on its carbon credits at $40. So, currently, if an average Australian household emitting 20 tonnes of CO² wants to go &#8216;carbon neutral&#8217;, it would cost $400 per annum. The equivalent would be to plant about 80 trees.</p>
<p><strong>What is a Footprint?</strong></p>
<p>A carbon footprint is a measure of the impact that our activities have on the environment, and in particular, greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. It relates to the amount of greenhouse gases produced in our day-to-day activities through burning fossil fuels for electricity, heating and transportation, etc.</p>
<p>An alternative definition of the carbon footprint is the total amount of carbon dioxide attributable to the actions of an individual or an entity (which includes emissions through their own energy use, but also from unforeseen emissions as well) over a period of one year.</p>
<p>So the aim is to work out your footprint, reduce your footprint, and then offset the remaining emissions. It&#8217;s much cheaper than buying solar panels, which still won&#8217;t eliminate your emissions, though it helps.</p>
<p><strong>What does Carbon Neutral mean?</strong></p>
<p>Being &#8216;carbon neutral&#8217; means that you have calculated your carbon footprint, and then eliminated the Greenhouse Gas you produce by purchasing carbon credits to offset your emissions.</p>
<p>But being &#8216;carbon neutral&#8217; takes a little more responsibility than just offsetting. To become carbon neutral, especially for businesses, you need to reduce your carbon footprint first, and commit to continue reducing your emissions.</p>
<p>Beware of businesses claiming to be carbon neutral. Check their accreditation, where they get their carbon credits from, and whether they truly are &#8216;green&#8217;.</p>
</div>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="sig" class="sig">
<p>By Jacqui Brauman, Director of the Australian Institute for Carbon Trading, <a id="link_93" href="http://www.carbonneutralnow.com.au/" target="_new">http://www.carbonneutralnow.com.au</a></p>
<div>
<p>Article Source: <a id="link_94" href="http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Jacqui_Brauman">http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Jacqui_Brauman</a></p>
<p></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/carbon-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Something Missing From the Green Movement?</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/missing-green-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/missing-green-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earth Day, 2009 has passed. The popularity of the organic lifestyle or green living has traveled far and has reached international proportions. However, are we missing a major green component? The green lifestyle has become a new way of life for politicians, celebrities and consumers. In fact, support for protecting our climate and environment has become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Earth Day Poster Design by morgantj, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/morgantj/3454694528/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3353/3454694528_558c24c4b8.jpg" alt="Earth Day Poster Design" width="300" height="400" /></a></p>
<div id="body">
<p><em>Earth Day, 2009 has passed. The popularity of the organic lifestyle or green living has traveled far and has reached international proportions. However, are we missing a major green component?</em></p>
<p>The green lifestyle has become a new way of life for politicians, celebrities and consumers. In fact, support for protecting our climate and environment has become an international bandwagon that continues traveling throughout the US and the world.</p>
<p>As a result of increased green product sales and strong media support, the green bandwagon continues to tour our planet. However, the definition of green living has been revised for several years by green industry organizations to include <em>social responsibility</em>. Many of us are unaware that green living is connected to social responsibility, yet the green bandwagon continues its journey past Earth Day 2009 with much of the public uninformed.</p>
<p>Where did this concept of social responsibility come from? How do we define and describe it? How do we apply it in the course of our daily lives?  Although they are both commendable, what is the real connection between social responsibility and our environment in the first place?  As we answer these questions and remove the familiar green wrapping, we&#8217;ll find the spiritual soul of the green movement.</p>
<p>Every green company that submits a membership application to Green America must provide evidence of meeting standards of environmental and social responsibility. If they pass this screening process, they become a member of the &#8220;Green Business Network&#8221; and receive the prestigious Green America &#8220;Seal of Approval for People and Planet&#8221;. This level of commitment for &#8220;people and planet&#8221; is recognized by the green industry and by knowledgeable green consumers searching for a reliable green company.</p>
<p>The concept of &#8220;green social responsibility&#8221; evolved from organizations that support the green industry and the public. They include the Organic Trade Association (<a id="link_93" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ota.com/" target="_new">www.ota.com</a>), Green America (<a id="link_94" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.coopamerica.org/" target="_new">www.coopamerica.org</a>) and several others. These organizations provide a great deal of consumer information through online resources such as the &#8220;Organic Pages Online&#8221; the &#8220;O&#8217;Mama Report&#8221; (OTA), &#8220;The National Green Pages&#8221; and &#8220;The Green American&#8221; (Green America).</p>
<p>Social responsibility can apply to social justice, including fair wages and working conditions. It is best defined as our willingness to &#8220;assume responsibility for others&#8221;. In addition to supporting workers, this phrase frequently refers to &#8220;charitable giving&#8221;.  Charity implies deeds of compassion such as volunteering in a soup kitchen, donating financial support  for environmental preservation or simply providing a few words of encouragement to someone in need. </p>
<p>Why are many people and the media unaware that green speaks to social responsibility?  Despite the efforts to inform consumers by the organizations mentioned earlier, it appears the message is not being received. Perhaps part of the problem is that many hear the message but don&#8217;t see the connection between the two.</p>
<p>So what is the connection between social responsibility and a green lifestyle. The answer relates to who we are and how we set our priorities. Are we willing to sacrifice our personal needs for the sake of helping the environment or others in need?  This is the essence of a green lifestyle. Green living connects with social responsibility because they both develop from the same source regarding right and wrong.</p>
<p>A green or greener lifestyle is based on deeds or acts of compassion towards our planet and its inhabitants. Our thoughts and feelings govern our deeds and actions.  When our thoughts are positive it leads to feelings of compassion, hope, and courage.  What is the source for our thoughts and feelings?  They all come from our spirit.  A positive spirit is the soul of the green movement. It generates our conscience about right and wrong and drives us to make personal sacrifices for what we believe is right. It is the source of our concern about the environment and others in need. It allows us to give of ourselves and minimize our own needs. It provides us with compassion for our planet and enables us to assume responsibility for other &#8220;passengers on spaceship Earth&#8221;.</p></div>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="sig" class="sig"><br />
Bob Folkart is Vice-President of Live Life Organics, a company focused on inspiring a positive lifestyle encouraging personal triumph and responsibility for our planet and fellow man. They provide positive messages on their organic apparel, such as &#8220;Be Compassionate&#8230;True Beauty, promoting positive thinking and a committment to the Earth and its inhabitants. Additionally, every article of their eco-friendly, organc cotton clothing carries a hangtag that can be planted in the earth to recycle and grow into wildflowers celebrating the environment and the beauty of life on Earth. Live life Organics is Green America Approved providing 100% organic cotton apparel using water based inks and low impact dyes. To view these organic products, go to:    </p>
<p><a id="link_95" href="http://www.livelifeorganics.com/" target="_new">http://www.livelifeorganics.com</a>.</p>
<div>
<p>Article Source: <a id="link_96" href="http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Bob_Folkart">http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Bob_Folkart</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/missing-green-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Kyoto Protocol?</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/kyoto-protocol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/kyoto-protocol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 01:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The landmark Kyoto Protocol is so famous that it is often misunderstood as a stand-alone agreement. Instead, it is what the name says: a protocol, in this case of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on climate change. The treaty&#8217;s purpose is to regulate man-made greenhouse gas emissions with the goal of stabilizing global climate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Australia 2 - climate change canvas by oxfam international, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/oxfam/3058676922/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3157/3058676922_c5fc2b5793.jpg" alt="Australia 2 - climate change canvas" width="400" height="266.4" /></a></p>
<div id="body">
<p>The landmark Kyoto Protocol is so famous that it is often misunderstood as a stand-alone agreement. Instead, it is what the name says: a protocol, in this case of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on climate change. The treaty&#8217;s purpose is to regulate man-made greenhouse gas emissions with the goal of stabilizing global climate change.</p>
<p>Negotiations on the treaty were concluded in December 1997, with most of the signatories joining the treaty regime by March 1999. However, the treaty did not come into force until February 2005 with the ascension of Russia to the Kyoto regime. The United States also signed the treaty, doing so in 1998, but neither President Clinton nor President Bush submitted the treaty to the senate for ratification. Without that ratification, the American signature on the Kyoto Protocol is effectively worthless. This was compounded when the Bush administration abruptly and provocatively withdrew from Kyoto negotiations in April 2001. Currently, the United States remains the sole unratified signatory. Non-signatories include Afghanistan, Andorra, Brunei, Chad, Iraq, the Palestinian National Authority, San Marino, Taiwan and Zimbabwe.</p>
<p>The Kyoto Protocol binds a set of countries listed in Annex I to specific reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Annex I states are essentially the same as Western industrialized countries. The other signatories of the Kyoto Protocol have agreed to a more general principal of greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore China, who stands as the single largest polluter on Earth, is not bound to meet any specific reduction target by Kyoto.<span id="more-506"></span></p>
<p>The other key provision of the Kyoto Protocol is the cap and trade system. Annex I countries have a carbon emissions &#8220;cap,&#8221; or maximum limit imposed upon them. This requires them to reduce their emissions by an average of 5.2% of their 1990 emissions level by a target date between 2008 and 2012. However, there is a &#8220;trading&#8221; escape valve, where states or companies can buy &#8220;emissions credits&#8221; to make up the difference between actual performance and their established &#8220;cap.&#8221; The European Union actually created its own Emissions Trading Scheme in 2003 to serve as a market for emissions allowances.</p>
<p>Despite the lack of national participation, several U.S. states have formed an organization that operates under Kyoto-like terms, including a cap and trade emissions system. This is called the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and consists of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Massachusetts, and Maryland. While not joining the group, California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a law that calls for California to cut it&#8217;s emission to Kyoto-like levels. In addition, dozens of US cities have independent greenhouse gas emissions reductions programs.</p>
<p>Critics of the Kyoto Protocol focus on a cost-benefit analysis of the actions called for by the treaty, and note that the cuts called for by the Protocol will have only a small impact on global warming. They also note that by effectively leaving countries such as India and especially China out of the system it does not address major sources of emissions that are still growing. After all, while the United States is the world&#8217;s largest per capita emitter of carbon dioxide, its growth rate is effectively frozen or in marginal decline. China&#8217;s emissions are the largest in absolute terms and growing explosively.</p>
<p>However, the Kyoto Protocol was never intended to be the end-all, be-all treaty regarding carbon emissions and climate change. It was only ever intended to be the necessary first step to start the process. Any successor agreements would call for another round of emissions reductions, and it is doubtful that such a treaty would be ratified even by the parliaments of Kyoto-enthusiasts in Europe and Japan if it did not include at least an emissions freeze on countries like Brazil, China and India. However, the big missing link still remains the United States and without American participation, the Kyoto Protocol remains only partially workable.</p>
</div>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="sig" class="sig"><br />
For more global warming articles and daily news why not visit <a id="link_91" href="http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com/" target="_new">http://www.globalwarmingnewsblog.com</a> &#8211; a site dedicated to information about climate change: effects, issues, causes, solutions, opinion and more.</p>
<div>
<p>Article Source: <a id="link_92" href="http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=John_O'Hara">http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=John_O&#8217;Hara</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/kyoto-protocol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems of Uranium Mining</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/problems-uranium-mining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/problems-uranium-mining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radon gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tailings squander Even the utmost grade deposits have less than 1% uranium. So vast amounts of ore have to be processed to obtain useful quantities of the uranium. The leftover &#8216;waste&#8217; rock is known tailings. In the course of processing it is crushed to a well powder, which is nearly as radioactive as the uranium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Uranium by Curtis Gregory Perry, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/curtisperry/57002838/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/28/57002838_848680c336.jpg" alt="Uranium" width="300" height="400" /></a></p>
<div id="body">
<p><strong>Tailings squander</strong></p>
<p>Even the utmost grade deposits have less than 1% uranium. So vast amounts of ore have to be processed to obtain useful quantities of the uranium. The leftover &#8216;waste&#8217; rock is known tailings. In the course of processing it is crushed to a well powder, which is nearly as radioactive as the uranium itself. It is perilous for more than 250,000 years, which might as well be eternally. These tailings need to be secluded from the environment to avoid a cancer epidemic, and there are previously more than 50 million tonnes of uranium tailings on Australian soil.</p>
<p><strong>Radon Gas</strong></p>
<p>As uranium emanates radiation; it transforms itself into a novel element, which in turn emanates radiation and decays, and so on through 14 steps until it ultimately &#8211; after hundreds of thousands of years &#8211; becomes a stable type of non-radioactive lead. One of the elements along the way is radon, a radioactive gas which can travel for hundreds of kilometres prior to decaying. Mine workers and others who breathe in this gas risk mounting lung cancer and other kinds of lung disease</p>
<p><strong>Environmental Pollution</strong></p>
<p>Uranium mining pollutes the air, water and earth with radioactive chemicals and heavy metals which can never be well cleaned up. In addition to the radiation hazard, mining is also related with poisonous process chemicals, heavy metals and the use of vast quantities of water. In the short term, uranium mine sites ruin the ecology of the local region; in the long term, they pose a risk to a much wider area.</p>
<p><strong>Health risks</strong></p>
<p>The health risks of uranium mining are by now fairly well known, although still belligerently disputed by the mining industry. Collectively, uranium miners suffer the maximum radiation doses of all workers in the nuclear fuel chain. The major problems are inhalation of dust and radon gas, which leave alpha radiation emitters lodged in the body where they can do the majority harm. As the pollution from the mines spread away from the minesite, local people are also out in the open to contamination. While uranium mining is most usually allied with cancer, low level radiation is also mixed up in birth fault, high infant mortality and chronic lung, eye, skin and reproductive illnesses.</p>
<p><strong>Nuclear Waste</strong></p>
<p>There is a vast amount of high level nuclear waste still being spewed out by reactors round the world and there is nowhere safe to put it. Pangea Resources actually has a plan to bring many of this waste into Australia. Nuclear power stations create this waste as fraction of normal operations; but there are also risks of reactor accidents; the explosion at Chernobyl in 1986 killed a lot of people, spread nuclear pollution right around the planet and forced the enduring evacuation of the surrounding area.</p>
<p><strong>Nuclear Weapons</strong></p>
<p>While the mining companies do not like to confess it, nuclear power is a military technology designed to make plutonium for nuclear weapons. Thousands of these weapons are still on hairtrigger alert ten further than ten years after the Cold War, and they are spreading gradually to new countries.</p></div>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div id="sig" class="sig"><br />
Bryan Peter is a Copywriter of <a id="link_83" href="http://www.greatmining.com/" target="_new">Mining Industry</a> We provide latest updates in the mining industry, the rich information in this site gives valuable inputs with regards to types of metals, minerals &amp; precious stones and their properties. For more information visit: <a id="link_84" href="http://www.greatmining.com/" target="_new">Uranium Mining</a> contact him at<a id="link_85" href="mailto:brayan.peter@gmail.com">brayan.peter@gmail.com</a>  </p>
<div>
<p>Article Source: <a id="link_86" href="http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Brayan_Peter">http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Brayan_Peter</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/problems-uranium-mining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are Carbon Offsets?</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/what-are-carbon-offsets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/what-are-carbon-offsets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 05:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon offsets are financial instruments that may be purchased and traded to compensate the GHG emissions released by a person or a firm. The rationale behind purchasing offsets is to balance those emissions that cannot be avoided during the course of our normal lives. If one generates emissions in the presence of an alternate sustainable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Cute Pollution by Kamillionaire, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kamil/359938675/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/142/359938675_d672e5c078.jpg" alt="Cute Pollution" width="400" height="266.4" /></a></p>
<p>Carbon offsets are financial instruments that may be purchased and traded to compensate the <a>GHG</a> emissions released by a person or a firm. The rationale behind purchasing offsets is to balance those emissions that cannot be avoided during the course of our normal lives. If one generates emissions in the presence of an alternate sustainable way, it is generally objected to by eco-conscious people. For ease, one carbon offset is determined as the decrease of one metric ton of CO2.</p>
<p>Numerous nations in Europe have made nationwide legislations that permit organizations to emit up to a specific amount of emissions. If a company emits more than the assigned limit, it has to purchase carbon offsets to settle the equation. While this obligatory requirement to sustain a low carbon footprint is the major driver of carbon trading, there is another smaller voluntary market. People who care for the environment purchase offsets to eliminate their personal carbon footprint though they are not required by law to do this.</p>
<p>So that’s how the demand for carbon offsets arises, either due to legal regulations that somehow penalize organizations or via increasing environmental awareness amongst voluntary purchasers. But how are offsets ‘manufactured’? Offset providers take part in large scale projects that are designed to curb GHG emissions in hundreds of thousands of metric tons, and as mentioned earlier, every metric ton of greenhouse gas reduced produces an offset. The aim is to lessen the overall emissions released into the air without worrying about borders.</p>
<p>This is comprehensible because greenhouse gases released in one nation affect the whole planet when they mix into thin air. And that’s why several carbon offsetting projects are executed in India even though most of offset purchasers reside in Europe and North America. This approach has become famous because reducing greenhouse gases in developing nations is mostly inexpensive than curbing the same quantity of emissions in western nations.</p>
<p>This small article won’t enter the debate of carbon offset scams. All in all, carbon offsets do play a role in reduction of greenhouse gases if generated by legitimate projects and sold with complete transparency.<br />
<br />
<strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.solarenergyangel.com/solar-energy/what-are-carbon-offsets-267/"> Greenhouse Gas</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/what-are-carbon-offsets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Species Biodiversity Breakdown</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/species-biodiversity-breakdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/species-biodiversity-breakdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all known species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity breakdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vertebrate species]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Life on earth consists of roughly 1,750,000 known species.  Scientists differ in their best guesses on how many species currently inhabit the earth, but 3 &#8211; 100 million is the generally accepted range.   Biodiversity is unevenly distributed across the planet due to many factors.  Altitude, temperature, composition, and rainfall are just some of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Biodiversity by Dom Dada, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ogil/2540634421/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2378/2540634421_ff85bd2e7c.jpg" alt="Biodiversity" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Life on earth consists of roughly 1,750,000 known species.  Scientists differ in their best guesses on how many species currently inhabit the earth, but 3 &#8211; 100 million is the generally accepted range.  </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Biodiversity is unevenly distributed across the planet due to many factors.  Altitude, temperature, composition, and rainfall are just some of the variables that help determine species diversity and distribution.  Rich plant growth generally fosters a more vibrant array of animal life resulting in abundant allocation of species in and around tropical regions.  This is because plants, directly and indirectly, supply the energy needs for all life on earth through photosynthesis. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Greater biodiversity helps to promote natural environmental systems like water and air filtering.  Supporting biodiversity involves protecting animal and plant habitat throughout the world.  Even single trees in the rain forests of Central America have shown hundreds of species of insects unique to that tree alone.  Every chunk of forest destroyed potentially destroys hundreds of beneficial organisms.  With this habitat destruction, we lose the ability to gather information that is useful in medications and new technologies.  </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It is because of this that it is important to protect our natural environment and continue to promote a healthy planet that can sustain a variety of organisms.</p>
<p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>All Known Life &#8211; 1,750,000 species</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The number of known species is broken down below:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Animals <span>               </span><span>                 </span>75.7%<span>                   </span>1,324,000 known species</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Plants<span>                    </span><span>                </span>15.4%<span>                    </span>270,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Protists<span>                 </span><span>                 </span>4.6%<span>                     </span>80,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fungi<span>                     </span><span>                </span>4.1%<span>                     </span>72,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Bacteria<span>                </span><span>                 </span>0.2%<span>                      </span>4000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Archaea<span>               </span><span>                  </span>0.3%<span>                      </span>500</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Animal group expanded:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Insects<span>                  </span><span>                </span>72.7%<span>                    </span>963,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Other groups<span>     </span><span>                   </span>7.5%<span>                      </span>99,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Arachnids<span>            </span><span>                 </span>5.7%<span>                      </span>75,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Molluscs<span>              </span><span>                 </span>5.3%<span>                      </span>70,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Vertebrates<span>       </span><span>                    </span>3.9%<span>                      </span>52,000<span>   </span><span>                </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Crustaceans<span>       </span><span>                  </span>3.0%<span>                      </span>40,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Roundworms<span>     </span><span>                   </span>3.0%<span>                      </span>25,000</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Vertebrates broken down further:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fishes<span>   </span><span>                </span><span>                </span>48.0%<span>                    </span>24,900</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Birds<span>                      </span><span>               </span>19.0%<span>                    </span>9,880</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Reptiles<span>                                </span>14.0%<span>                    </span>7,280</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Amphibians<span>        </span><span>                  </span>10.0%<span>                    </span>5,200</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mammals<span>            </span><span>                   </span>9.0%<span>                     </span>4,680<span>     </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/species-biodiversity-breakdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Living: What it’s Really About</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/green-living-what-it%e2%80%99s-really-about/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/green-living-what-it%e2%80%99s-really-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conserve energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[going green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you hear the term “green living”, you may get an image in your head of hippies living in communes making everything they use. Truth is:  the definition of green living has changed. The concept simply includes doing things to help the environment be viable for future generations. If you don’t feel like shedding your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Near my wild river... my green living room...!!! / Près de ma rivière sauvage... mon salon vert...!!! :))) by denis collette, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/deniscollette/2633671412/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3071/2633671412_3768f7e10f.jpg" alt="Near my wild river... my green living room...!!! / Près de ma rivière sauvage... mon salon vert...!!! :)))" width="400" height="321" /></a></p>
<p>When you hear the term “green living”, you may get an image in your head of hippies living in communes making everything they use. Truth is:  the definition of <a>green living</a> has changed. The concept simply includes doing things to help the environment be viable for future generations. If you don’t feel like shedding your worldly possessions and living in a mud hut, here are a few steps you can take to make your life a little greener.</p>
<p><strong>Buy local organic products.</strong> Organic farmers not only use little to no chemicals, they also take steps to reduce water and soil degradation, along with other problems caused by traditional agriculture. Grocery store vegetables have usually been shipped a long way, which causes environmental pollution trucks and planes. Buy your produce from a local farmer’s market or coop. If you can’t find one, start your own organic garden.</p>
<p><strong>Use <a>natural products</a>.</strong> Household products that don’t contain chemicals are not only better for the environment; they’re safer for your family as well. You can make various cleaning products from stuff in your kitchen, like vinegar. If you don’t have the time, there are products you can buy. Just make sure they’re all natural and don’t just have a few natural ingredients. </p>
<p><strong>Reduce.</strong> We’ve all heard the spiel about reduce, reuse, recycle; however, most of us focus on recycling and completely ignore the reducing. Try to use products that don’t end up in landfills like cloth diapers instead of disposables or regular towels instead of paper ones. Buying concentrated products or products in bulk also helps reduce packaging materials, production and distribution costs.</p>
<p></p>
<p><strong>Reuse.</strong> Many people have gotten in the habit of sending their recyclables away in the bins, but there’s more supply than demand in the recycling market. That’s why it’s also important to reuse items if you can. Before you throw something in the recycling bin, consider whether you could reuse it for something else. Also consider programs like freecycle, Craig’s list or garage sales which allows you to offer your gently used (or even broken) items to someone else. You really never know when your trash is someone else’s treasure or learning tool. </p>
<p><strong>Recycle.</strong> We should all have a recycle bin in our homes, but you can do stuff to recycle on your own. Make your own rich soils with a compost pile and you can recycle plants, shredded paper and uneaten bits of fruit or vegetables. You can also use products like shredded plastic bags to mulch your garden.  If you get creative, there’s lots of recycling you can do on your own.</p>
<p><strong>Conserve Energy.</strong> There are so many things you can do to save energy. The big plus on this is that it also saves you money. Get low energy light bulbs for your fixtures. You could also take more drastic renovation steps by getting new energy efficient windows or installing solar panels. Even small steps like setting the thermostat a degree higher or lower or unplugging appliances not in use can make a big difference. A big way to <a>conserve energy</a> is to get a more fuel efficient car, or get rid of your car altogether. If you don’t need a big SUV, then don’t get one. You’ll be doing the environment a big favor.</p>
<p><strong>Teach your children.</strong> You might not be able to change the world on your own, but you can start a trend by teaching others to be more environmentally friendly, starting with your own kids. Make sure your children know what steps you are taking to improve the environment and why. And most importantly, make sure you are all doing all you can for a sustainable future!</p>
<p>No Tags</p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.solarenergyangel.com/solar-energy/green-living-what-its-really-about-91/">solar energy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/green-living-what-it%e2%80%99s-really-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Deserves the Green Light?</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/ideas/who-deserves-the-green-light/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/ideas/who-deserves-the-green-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Report II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubert Humphrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recyclables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plenty of products these days claim to be environmentally friendly, recyclable or biodegradable. And the list of buzzwords for environmental marketing claims continues to grow. But how many of these claims stretch the truth just to sell more product? By creating a set of regulations, Hubert Humphrey III says he hopes to stop what he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="We Recycle! by Diamondduste, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/diamondduste/239236294/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/89/239236294_8424d1573d.jpg" alt="We Recycle!" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Plenty of products these days claim to be environmentally friendly, recyclable or biodegradable. And the list of buzzwords for environmental marketing claims continues to grow.</p>
<p>But how many of these claims stretch the truth just to sell more product? By creating a set of regulations, Hubert Humphrey III says he hopes to stop what he calls green-collar crime.</p>
<p>Humphrey, Minnesota’s attorney general, has become a national leader in this quest for consistency and accuracy in the use of environmental claims. He currently heads a task force to address the situation with 10 other state attorneys general.</p>
<p>On behalf of all states, this task force prepared Green Report II, a 50-page list of recommendations on green marketing. The report has been submitted to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for consideration and distributed to the corporate world, as well.</p>
<p>“Green Report II goes a long way toward establishing guidelines for marketers,” Humphrey said. “Many companies are trying to do the right thing, but we need to keep the green revolution on the right course by establishing standards and enforcing them at both state and national levels.”<br />
<br />
The FTC held hearings on the subject in July. And Humphrey has testified before a Senate subcommittee regarding a bill that calls for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to get involved in green marketing.</p>
<p>“Both the FTC and the EPA have roles to play,” Humphrey said. “The FTC should monitor the day-to-day activities to prevent green-collar fraud, while the EPA has the expertise to define long-term standards. We have a unique situation where consumer protection is merging with environmental protection.”</p>
<p>But the consumer has a role to play as well, he added.</p>
<p>“As we walk down the supermarket aisles, our choices are affecting the environment,” Humphrey said. “And those choices need to be driven by more than just price and quality. That’s why I want to see more accurate information presented to the public.”</p>
<p>However, government control isn’t the consumer’s only hope to achieve more accurate and consistent product claims. Humphrey said he is optimistic about the industry’s own self-regulation efforts. Certification programs like Green Seal and Green Cross, which designate products that are beneficial to the environment, also will help the effort, he noted.</p>
<p>“Certification programs can be very valuable in developing an atmosphere of trust,” he said. “These programs should require producers to maximize efforts, where the FTC and EPA will establish minimum standards.”</p>
<p>If Humphrey achieves his goals, the old warning “buyer beware” no longer will be a consumer’s only source of protection from false environmental claims.</p>
<p>(Tip/Stat) Shoppers make an average 2.3 trips to the grocery store every week. Eliminating one of those trips would save time and energy.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/green+business">green business</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/consumer+protection">consumer protection</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/environmental+protection">environmental protection</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/environmental+marketing+claims">environmental marketing claims</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/environmental+marketing">environmental marketing</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/green+marketing">green marketing</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/environmental+fraud">environmental fraud</a></p>
<div><a title="Bookmark using any bookmark manager!" href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" border="0" alt="" width="125" height="16" /></a></div>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.earthnewsmedia.com/2008/06/28/who-deserves-the-green-light/">environmental marketing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/ideas/who-deserves-the-green-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carolina Wetlands in Use and Intact</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/carolina-wetlands-in-use-and-intact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/carolina-wetlands-in-use-and-intact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Wetlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasterwater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetlands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wetlands are to nature what kidneys are to the human body. By using these natural kidneys as filters, a South Carolina county is processing wastewater in an energy efficient manner while leaving the wetlands unharmed. In Horry County — South Carolina’s fastest growing county with Myrtle Beach as its hub — a sewage disposal system [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Marsh and Grass by Jim Frazier, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimfrazier/2219376651/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2235/2219376651_b30a78d0ff.jpg" alt="Marsh and Grass" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Wetlands are to nature what kidneys are to the human body.</p>
<p>By using these natural kidneys as filters, a South Carolina county is processing wastewater in an energy efficient manner while leaving the wetlands unharmed.</p>
<p>In Horry County — South Carolina’s fastest growing county with Myrtle Beach as its hub — a sewage disposal system is dumping 450,000 gallons of wastewater a day into wetlands. And the natural settings are thriving.</p>
<p>“Fifty percent of the county is wetlands, so it became a natural alternative to consider,” said Larry Schwartz, an environmental planner with the Grand Strand Water and Sewer Authority, which handles wastewater treatment for the county. “We’re just using the natural filtering ability of the land to renovate wastewater.”</p>
<p>The wastewater is being distributed evenly across one Carolina Bay, an example of the egg-shaped natural depressions unique to coastal regions of the Southeast. These bays, usually filled with peat and shrubs, act as buffers between the uplands and the region’s fragile black-water rivers — so named because they are dark-colored, slow-moving and hold small amounts of dissolved oxygen.</p>
<p>Currently, only one bay is receiving wastewater. But eventually four bays may be used to treat up to 2.5 million gallons a day as the county grows over the next 20 years, Schwartz said.<br />
<br />
A series of boardwalks crisscrosses the bay to support distribution pipes carrying the wastewater. Two-inch holes every 15 to 20 feet allow the water to splash on rocks and disperse evenly across the bay.</p>
<p>The wastewater has been treated to secondary levels before it enters the bay, Schwartz said, meaning 85 percent of all organics and wastes have been removed. To finish cleaning the water using man-made treatment systems, large amounts of energy are required.</p>
<p>“But in this case we’re using energy from the sun,” he said. “That’s the beauty of it — the system is cost-effective and energy-efficient.”</p>
<p>A dozen government agencies at both state and national levels are involved in the project. Two biologists work full time testing the water quality and studying the natural habitat, Schwartz said.</p>
<p>“Our goal is to maintain the value of the natural communities in the bays and manage them so they remain the same — and in the process achieve advanced wastewater treatment,” he said.</p>
<p>The project has generated plenty of interest from other states, including some that hope to construct their own wetlands for similar purposes, said Schwartz, who averages at least one tour a week of the county’s wastewater system.</p>
<p>“It’s a major new way to do things,” he said. “With wetlands, if they are selected and managed properly, there is no reason not to use them.”</p>
<p>(Tip/Stat) Carolina Bays are the only place Venus Fly Traps — the infamous carnivorous plant — can be found in the United States.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/wetlands">wetlands</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/South+Carolina">South Carolina</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/wastewater">wastewater</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/wastewater+treatment">wastewater treatment</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/energy">energy</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/going+green">going green</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/environmental+issues">environmental issues</a></p>
<div><a title="Bookmark using any bookmark manager!" href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" border="0" alt="" width="125" height="16" /></a></div>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> <a href="http://www.earthnewsmedia.com/2008/07/09/carolina-wetlands-in-use-and-intact/">South Carolina</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/carolina-wetlands-in-use-and-intact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offshore drilling resistance evaporating</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/offshore-drilling-resistance-evaporating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/offshore-drilling-resistance-evaporating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eco Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore oil drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil rig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax incentives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Worldwatch Institute published an article detailing a decline in offshore drilling opposition in sharp contrast to the year 1982 when the drilling moratorium was enacted. Further expansions by George H. W. Bush in 1990 extended the moratorium to include the coasts of Florida, California and New England. With the presidency of Clinton in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="The platform that tried to gulp the sun by ®oberto's, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stelling/14770532/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/10/14770532_c2ad0a2bed.jpg" alt="The platform that tried to gulp the sun" width="400" height="265" /></a></p>
<p>Today, the <a href="http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5874">Worldwatch Institute</a> published an article detailing a decline in offshore drilling opposition in sharp contrast to the year 1982 when the drilling moratorium was enacted. Further expansions by George H. W. Bush in 1990 extended the moratorium to include the coasts of Florida, California and New England. With the presidency of Clinton in 1998, the ban was again extended until the year 2012.</p>
<p>During this time, the United States government has went as far as to <a href="http://www.fws.gov/southeast/news/2002/n02-002.html">buy back drilling leases</a> off the coasts of Florida from such companies as Chevron, Conoco, and Murphy. In 2002, the Bush Administration paid $115 million to these companies to drop the offshore claims they held at the request of Florida Governor Jeb Bush. Further settlements were proposed to entities such as the Collier family to relinquish mineral rights held in the Everglades. The government offered $350 million in tax deductions and $120 million in cash for mineral rights that the National Park Services and Department of Interior estimated at $20 million and $43 million, respectively. Besides, opening a few areas within the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-06-29-offshore-drilling_x.htm">Gulf of Mexico in 2006</a>, expansion of offshore drilling leases has been mostly stagnant.<br />
<br />
Recent oil prices and focus on acquiring less foreign oil has begun to change the consensus on expansion of U.S. offshore drilling. Reports by <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/67_support_offshore_drilling_64_expect_it_will_lower_prices">Rasmussen</a> show that 67% of voters favor offshore drilling while 64% feel more drilling will lower high gas prices. It seems clear to why the majority of Americans now support an increase in offshore drilling. Effects on the pocketbook speak very loudly, but this is not the only reason for the change in attitude towards the long held view of offshore drilling, being environmentally unfriendly.</p>
<p>Lumped alongside the bill to lift the offshore drilling ban, are a few healthy nuggets of environmental stewardship. Consumer tax credits for fuel-efficient and clean energy vehicles, renewable energy tax credits, development of alternative fuel sources, and mass transit funding are just a few of the environmental benefits outlined in a plan that many hope will see a vote during this year&#8217;s session. Though most environmental groups still oppose lifting the offshore drilling ban, many feel the added benefits are so beneficial to providing clean energy and healthy environment, that a compromise can be made. If a vote is not exercised before the conclusion of Congress this fall, any decision will be left till next year while also including the next President of the United States.</p>
<p>Though Republicans do not feel the Democrats&#8217; plan goes far enough to expand new energy sources, past attitudes of &#8220;no new leases&#8221;, has swayed with restrictions requiring current leases be explored further, and the added tax incentives for renewable energy energy sources. Safer drilling practices, higher oil prices, and increased pressure on providing an energy independent America, may soon make new offshore drilling a reality along thousands of acres of U.S. coastline.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Offshore Oil Rig by Lance and Erin, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lance_mountain/332022296/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/146/332022296_1c2b333ec2.jpg" alt="Offshore Oil Rig" width="400" height="266" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/offshore-drilling-resistance-evaporating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor water quality being addressed by UN</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/poor-water-quality-being-addressed-by-un/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/poor-water-quality-being-addressed-by-un/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Effects of Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lesotho Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor water quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The earth&#8217;s most abundant resource, and still we have trouble finding adequate clean drinking water for nearly 1 billion people worldwide. Climate forecasts can play a role in planning for meteorological events that contaminate and pollute water reserves. With pollution levels rising and frequent flooding throughout the world, advanced warning and proper monitoring could help [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="TS24-25 World Bank by World Bank Photo Collection, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/worldbank/1129045136/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1327/1129045136_96429db814.jpg" alt="TS24-25 World Bank" width="400" height="266" /></a></p>
<p>The earth&#8217;s most abundant resource, and still we have trouble finding adequate clean drinking water for nearly 1 billion people worldwide. Climate forecasts can play a role in planning for meteorological events that contaminate and pollute water reserves. With pollution levels rising and frequent flooding throughout the world, advanced warning and proper monitoring could help alleviate some of the growing problems of the water management needed to provide clean accessible water to all.</p>
<blockquote><p>2 September 2008 – The chief of the United Nations meteorological agency today called for weather forecasts to play a greater role in planning for economic development and poverty reduction because of the impact climate change has on water resources.</p>
<p>Michel Jarraud, the Secretary-General of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), told the World Water Congress that the agricultural, energy, tourism and health sectors are among those most affected by the impact of climate change due to drought, deterioration in water quality, increased run-off and an increase in the salinization of ground water as a result of rising sea levels.</p>
<p>“Mainstreaming climate change in decision-making processes will therefore be central to all development and poverty alleviation efforts,” he said at the meeting, held in Montpellier, France.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=27902&amp;Cr=climate&amp;Cr1=">un.org</a></p></blockquote>
<p><br />
In other water news, water management corruption in impoverished nations leads to a further deteriorating system for providing water to those that are in desperate need. Corruption is said to increase the price for water services by 10-30% worldwide. Many of the people hurt the most by this are those cannot afford basic necessities, let alone the price that comes after bribes and corruption has ran its part.</p>
<blockquote><p>Africa&#8217;s largest water transfer effort, the Lesotho Highlands Water Project, plans to supply water to the industrial heartland of South Africa and to generate energy for impoverished Lesotho. The multi-billion dollar investment offers economic growth and greater water security for underserved communities in the region.</p>
<p>The project also presents water officials with countless opportunities to become rich on the side. In 2002, Lesotho courts sentenced the project&#8217;s chief executive to prison for accepting bribes from 18 multinational companies that were vying for construction contracts.</p>
<p>The Lesotho case is a rare example of justice. Across the globe, the water sector is particularly prone to corruption, and the world&#8217;s poor are usually the ones who suffer the costs.</p>
<p>The pervasive nature of dirty water politics is blamed for much of the stalled progress in improving access to water resources in this year&#8217;s Global Corruption Report. It is the first report to assess how corruption affects the water sector worldwide.</p>
<p>The widespread corruption noted in the report reflects the large challenge of solving the world&#8217;s water problems. As growing populations compete for shrinking water resources, the opportunities for corruption will increase and the damaging effects will become more severe.</p>
<p>Source: <a title="WorldWatch.org" href="http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5872">worldwatch.org</a></p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="MA098S04 World Bank by World Bank Photo Collection, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/worldbank/2692582407/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3074/2692582407_a352f34aa0.jpg" alt="MA098S04 World Bank" width="400" height="256" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/poor-water-quality-being-addressed-by-un/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google enhances green technology development</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/google-enhances-green-technology-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/google-enhances-green-technology-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eco Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Savers Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enhanced Geothermal Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geothermal energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RechargeIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology grants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mega search engine Google.com, today announced an investment of $10.25 million in advancing the development of green technologies. Google is supporting a technology called, Enhanced Geothermal Systems, to help meet its goal of providing enough green energy to power a city the size of San Francisco. Through Google&#8217;s philanthropic entity Google.org, an initiative dubbed &#8220;Renewable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Earth Day Google Logo At Google Kirkland by dannysullivan, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dannysullivan/272645442/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/84/272645442_0aeec7a3d3.jpg" alt="Earth Day Google Logo At Google Kirkland" width="400" height="320" /></a></p>
<p>Mega search engine Google.com, today announced an investment of $10.25 million in advancing the development of <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/20080819_egs.html">green technologies</a>. Google is supporting a technology called, Enhanced Geothermal Systems, to help meet its goal of providing enough green energy to power a city the size of San Francisco. Through Google&#8217;s philanthropic entity Google.org, an initiative dubbed &#8220;Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal&#8221; has been laid out to make this goal a reality.</p>
<p>Enhanced Geothermal Systems generates energy by pumping cool water 2-3 miles into a reservoir lying on top of dry, hot basement rock. The water is then pumped back to the surface at which point in condenses and creates powerful steam that is used to propel turbines. After the steam cools, it is re-injected back into the reservoir to begin the process again. This process allows energy extraction in areas that do not have natural steam pockets and hot flowing water.</p>
<p>The investments pledged by Google will go to help fund 2 companies and a university working on the development of Enhanced Geothermal Systems. $6.25 million will go to <a title="AltaRock Energy Geothermal EGS" href="http://www.altarockenergy.com/egs.html">AltaRock Energy, Inc</a>, which will work to reduce the cost and efficiency of EGS technology. Potter Drilling, Inc. has been given $4 million to design drilling tools capable of penetrating deeper and stronger rock. Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab has been awarded a $489,521 grant to update geothermal maps and study geothermal resources in North America.<br />
<br />
Google has recently been involved in many steps to reduce its environmental footprint and promote green technology. Data centers housing Google servers, are being designed to cut the energy needed for cooling to 50% of similar installations. The idea is not only to save money, but to create a self sufficient business model that promotes clean energy. This initiative is evident in the production of a <a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=49007">1.6 megawatt solar energy plant</a> in Mountain View, California. Other projects include the <a href="http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=41">Climate Savers Computing Initiative</a> to create more efficient computers and servers, and the RechargeIT initiative aimed at developing electric vehicles and infrastructure.</p>
<p>Though $10.25 million may seem like a small amount to a power house company like Google, it shows considerable attention is being provided to changing the way we look at natural resources and energy generation. Google has the resources and intelligence to begin to leave a legacy that varies far from just creating one of the most popular websites of all time. Funding and support by Google leaders will help to attract more corporations with the potential for a green technology revolution. Though energy change falls on the hands of every citizen, major projects can not be completed without the funding and backing of large groups such as Google.</p>
<p>For Google Earth lovers, a <a href="http://www.google.org/egs/downloads/GeothermalResource.kmz">map overlay</a> has been provided by Google to show current distribution of geothermal resources. (Must have <a href="http://earth.google.com/">Google Earth</a>)</p>
<p>Google has also provided an <a href="http://www.google.org/egs/downloads/Policy_Paper_Geothermal.pdf">EGS policy brief</a> to outline what the U.S. Government can do to help encourage the production and continued innovation of this technology.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6r_3AgI49Y">Enhanced Geothermal Systems on YouTube</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Geothermal steam vents by Óli Jón, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/olijon/222947823/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/80/222947823_47e4bee6a0.jpg" alt="Geothermal steam vents" width="400" height="266" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/technology/google-enhances-green-technology-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7th Annual Des Moines: River Run Garbage Grab</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/7th-annual-des-moines-river-run-garbage-grab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/7th-annual-des-moines-river-run-garbage-grab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eco Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Des Moines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental service projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[River Run Garbage Grab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trash pickup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Des Moines, Iowa: On Saturday, the Polk Country Conservation Board hosted the 7th annual River Run Garbage Grab to clean up trash and debris along the Des Moines River south of the Saylorville Reservoir. Canoes, kayaks, and motorboats were launched along the river, by volunteers, to scour the banks and sandbars. Throughout the morning hours, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="River Run Garbage Grab 2008 by PlanMyGreen, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/planmygreen/2768574157/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3086/2768574157_bae3336a1f.jpg" alt="River Run Garbage Grab 2008" width="400" height="266" /></a></p>
<p>Des Moines, Iowa:<br />
On Saturday, the Polk Country Conservation Board hosted the 7th annual River Run Garbage Grab to clean up trash and debris along the Des Moines River south of the Saylorville Reservoir. Canoes, kayaks, and motorboats were launched along the river, by volunteers, to scour the banks and sandbars. Throughout the morning hours, boaters braved the beautiful weather and shining sun hoping to bring back the biggest piece of garbage.</p>
<p>Garbage sacks full of trash and canoes piled with everything from tires to rusty drums, were deposited safely into the hands of conservation board staff. Metro Waste Authority provided garbage bags and dumpsters for anything someone was willing to haul out of the river.<br />
Tires appeared to be especially sought after, as one volunteer could be heard cheering for a canoe delivering a pile of metal, paper, and a dirty fat tire.</p>
<p>Though, it did not appear that anything was found as big as the engine block that was hauled out during 2007, the Des Moines River is definitely a cleaner waterway after the great work by Iowa residents.</p>
<p>The river was not the only thing that got a thorough cleaning. Those volunteers that chose to stay on land, walked along the shore and picked up garbage lying near walking and biking trails. Among the trash collected on land was a twin sized mattress, propane tanks, beer cans, and countless coils of fishing line and bait containers.<br />
<br />
Many groups were represented at the River Run Garbage Grab ’08. Some of those in attendance were the Izaak Walton League of America, Des Moines Water Works and Central Iowa Anglers. The U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary Unit, Flotilla 4 of Des Moines Iowa, provided safety and security services which included a patrol vessel and jet skis. Their professionalism was put to the test when a motorboat capsized and the occupants were helped from the water. This effort would not have been made possible without all of the support from the many Iowan sponsors and volunteers.</p>
<p>Later today, a special celebration is being hosted for all of the volunteers involved. Free food, music, and door prizes will be given away at the Simon Estes Amphitheater. The entertainment will be provided by the Des Moines Community Steel Drum Band, Plymouth Church Chancel Choir, and John Stravers and the Big Blue Sky Band.</p>
<p>As an Iowan and American, I would like to personally thank all those involved with this great community service project. Keeping our rivers and trails clean is a small project that every community can contribute to. By spreading the word, the next annual River Run Garbage Grab will be even bigger and more beneficial.</p>
<p>Thank you Iowa.</p>
<p>For more information about the River Run Garbage Grab, visit <a title="River Stewards - River Run Garbage Grab 2008" href="http://www.riverstewards.org/">RiverStewards.org</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="US Coast Guard Flotilla 4 of Des Moines Iowa by PlanMyGreen, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/planmygreen/2769411486/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3103/2769411486_a0ede6dfcb.jpg" alt="US Coast Guard Flotilla 4 of Des Moines Iowa" width="400" height="266" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/7th-annual-des-moines-river-run-garbage-grab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-native species affecting U.S. coasts, rivers, and streams.</title>
		<link>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/non-native-species-affecting-us-coasts-rivers-and-streams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/non-native-species-affecting-us-coasts-rivers-and-streams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carribbean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Cayman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Cayman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine habitat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-native species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red lionfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reservoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snake river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walleye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planmygreen.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Native fish species have evolved over time to counter threats of bacteria, fungus, disease, and other native predatory species.  By adapting to the gradually changing environment, many of the species present today have became extremely robust in dealing with external pressures.  Until fairly recently though, native U.S. fish species have had little reason to adapt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Red lionfish (Cebu, Philippines) by alfonsator, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/alfonsator/367122553/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/173/367122553_2c5230e52f.jpg" alt="Red lionfish (Cebu, Philippines)" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>Native fish species have evolved over time to counter threats of bacteria, fungus, disease, and other native predatory species.  By adapting to the gradually changing environment, many of the species present today have became extremely robust in dealing with external pressures.  Until fairly recently though, native U.S. fish species have had little reason to adapt to the habits and threats of other species half way across the globe.  Now, with the addition of new species to U.S. waters, fish and plants have new challenges that they are not equipped to handle.</p>
<p>Recently, the Associated Press, has published information concerning the <a title="introduction of red lionfish" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184738/">introduction of red lionfish</a> from the Indian Ocean, into the coastal waters of Florida and the Caribbean.  Though a magnificent looking marine fish, the red lionfish population is beginning to swell and create problems for smaller native reef fish.  With poisonous spines and a voracious appetite, lionfish will consume any fish and crustaceans small enough to fit inside its mouth.</p>
<p>Not only is the lionfish a disaster for local marine life, the sting from the poison spines can be extremely painful for any person unlucky enough to get in its way.  This poison is a great defense for the fish, as very few larger species are able to consume the red lion, and rarely will a predator make the mistake twice.</p>
<p>Fisherman and divers in areas experiencing an increase of red lionfish, are being encouraged to catch and report any sightings.  These actions may help to control the outbreak, but it is very unlikely to have a profound effect on the numbers.</p>
<p>Since water quality and composition varies greatly around the world&#8217;s oceans, with the exception of the red lionfish, marine animals rarely become a problem that cannot be controlled by natural processes.  On the other hand, fresh bodies of water are much more susceptible to damage by &#8220;out-of-town&#8221; animals.<br />
<br />
<a title="Salmon along the Snake and Columbia rivers" href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/371693_salmon22.html">Salmon along the Snake and Columbia rivers</a>, are quickly declining in population due to non-native species consuming large amounts of the food sources and eggs.  The spread of parasites is also of great concern.</p>
<p>Quite ironically, the bass and walleye causing these problems, were introduced by biologists to provide a better environment for sport fisherman. Since recreational fishing provides funding in the form of licensing and taxes, stocking these game fishes was not thought to cause harm. Now, efforts to reduce the number of these game fish, have proven unsuccessful. The rate of reproduction out numbers any progress made my biologists and anglers to decrease the numbers of bass and walleye.</p>
<p>These new species are very well tailored to life within new reservoirs created by <a title="Hyrdo Power in NW United States" href="http://www.otec.coop/power_supply/hydropower_facts.htm">hydro electric dams</a>.  While bass, shad, and walleye flourish in the large open waters, salmon prefer the swift flowing waters of rivers and streams.</p>
<p>While developing ways to create clean energy and new opportunities, we must be sensitive to the outcomes of any changes made to the current surrounding habitats. Though hydro power is an abundant source of power, and man made reservoirs can increase the volume of water for fish and crustaceans, not all animals are effected the same. When non-native species find local waters well suited to their survival, many native species can be lost in the transition. Proper research and a little bit of restraint will help to keep native species thriving. Most of these situations can be avoiding by following local laws and regulations governing the release of non-native species into water sources.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Snake River by A Boy And His Bike, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aboyandhisbike/252908483/"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/81/252908483_14235ecc3b.jpg" alt="Snake River" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planmygreen.com/environment/non-native-species-affecting-us-coasts-rivers-and-streams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

